Volume 6, Issue 6, November 2018, Page: 188-194
On the Problem of Dispositive Norms of Private and Public Law of Modern Russia
Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov, Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Dostoevsky Omsk State University, Omsk, Russia
Received: May 10, 2018;       Accepted: Dec. 6, 2018;       Published: Jan. 10, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.hss.20180606.13      View  772      Downloads  111
It seems that dispositiveness in law is expressed not only in the methods, methods and types of legal regulation, but also in the relevant norms that objectively determine the independence and autonomy of the subjects of the realization of the law. Aims of the study: the purpose of the scientific article is the substantiation of the existence and functioning of dispositive norms of law not only in the private law branches, as many theoreticians believe, but also in public. To achieve this goal, the following tasks are set: to reveal the concept of disposability and to determine its relationship with the dispositive norms of law; group the positions of the authors from the point of view of their evaluation of dispositive norms: 1) scientists who show negative attitude towards dispositive norms; 2) authors who recognize dispositive norms, however, while focusing only on private law; 3) theorists who recognize the existence of dispositive legal norms, both in private and in public law, while emphasizing its more reasoned; analyze the features of dispositive norms, which in private law are of dominant importance; to show specificity of dispositive norms of law in various branches of public law (criminal procedural, criminal, tax);taking into account the effect of dispositive norms, both in private and in public law, clarify the concept of "dispositive norm", which is associated with valuation concepts, the content of which is disclosed in the process of exercising the law; to analyze appraisal concepts, which necessarily lead to dispositive norms; to show the interaction of dispositive norms of private and public law. As a result of the conducted research it can be concluded that dispositive norms exist and function not only in private but also in public law; their presence is largely determined by the so-called valuation concepts, which, in turn, determine the legal activity of both citizens and officials of the relevant state bodies. In the conclusion it should be noted that dispositive regulations of both private, and public law, are in interaction with the relevant peremptory norms, anyway, correspond to them.
Optionality, Private Law, Public Law, Democratization of Law, Discretion, Evaluation Concepts
To cite this article
Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov, On the Problem of Dispositive Norms of Private and Public Law of Modern Russia, Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 6, No. 6, 2018, pp. 188-194. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20180606.13
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Bednjacov Dmitry Evgenievich. Some aspects of judicial reform in Russia//Soviet state and law.1991. No. 1. P. 25.
Tumanov Vladimir Alexandrovich. On the legal nihilism//The pulse of reform. Lawyers and political scientists reflect. M., 1989. P.114.
Gushchina Nina Adamovna. The system of law and system of legislation: a ratio and some prospects of development//Jurisprudence.2003. No. 5. P. 201.
Gadzhiyeva Aisha Ansarovna. Dispositive norms in criminal law//State and law.2003 .No. 11. P.97.
Tabarin Igor Valeryevich. Modern theory of law: new scientific course: monograph. M., 2008. P.248-249.
Baytin Mikhail Iosifovich, Petrov Dmitry Evgenyevich. Method of regulation in the system of law: types and structure//Journal of Russian law.2006. No. 2. P.86.
Nersesyants Vladik Sumbatovich. General theory of law and state: textbook. M, 2010. P 399.
Chashchin Alexander Nikolayevich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M., 2008. P.294.
Baytin Mikhail Iosifovich. Essence of law (modern legal understanding on the verge of two centuries). M., 2005. P.252.
Lazarev Valery Vasilyevich, Lipen Sergey Vasilyevich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M., 2010. P.312; Lazarev Valery Vasilyevich. Norms of law//Theory of state and law: textbook//edited by Alik Galimzyanovich Khabibulin, Valery Vasilyevich Lazarev. M., 2009. P. 305.
Vlasov Vasily Ivanovich, Vlasova Galina Borisovna. Theory of state and law: textbook Rostov n/a, 2011. P.201.
Ivannikov Ivan Andreevich. General theory of state and law: textbook. M., 2008. P.196.
Kirimova Elena Andreyevna. On system-forming criteria of modern Russian law //Jurisprudence. 2002. No. 5. P. 157.
Pokrovsky Joseph Alexeevich. The main problems of civil law. Pg., 1917. P.309.
Agarkov Mikhail Mikhailovich. The value of private law. 1992.No. 1. P.33, 41.
Sukhanov Evgeny Alekseevich. System of private law// MSU Bulletin. Series "right".1994. No. 4.P.26.
Gushchina Nina Adamovna. The specified composition. P.202.
Baytin Mikhail Iosifovich, Petrov Dmitry Evgenyevich. The specified composition P.86.
Lapshin Ivan Sergeevich . Dispositive norms of law. H. Novgorod. 2002.P. 33.
Aliekserov Mizamir Ahmedbekovich. Method of civil procedural law//Journal of Russian law.2006. No. 7. P.79.
Bonner Alexander Timofeevich. The principle of dispositivity of Soviet civil procedural law. M., 1987. P.15.
Tikhomirov Yuri Aleksandrovich. Public law: textbook. M., 1995.P.46-47.
Tikhomirov Yuri Aleksandrovich Specified essay. P.46.
Valdes dal Re F. Decentralized organization of the labor market//Law and Economics. Regulatory intervention in a market economy. M., 2000. P.109.
Mavrin Sergey Petrovich. About the role of the method of legal regulation in the structuring and development of positive law// Jurisprudence.2003. No. 1. P.207.
Sorokin Valentin Dmytrovych. Elected. proceedings. St. Petersburg, 2005. P.873-874.
Khimicheva Galina Petrovna. Pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases: the concept of improvement of criminal procedure. M., 2003.P .20.
Makarova Zinaida Vitalyevna. Criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation: food for thought // Jurisprudence. 2003. No. 1. P.141.
Mikhaylovskaya Inga Borisovna. Individual rights - the new priority of the Criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation // Russian justice.2002. No. 7. P.3.
Alexandrov Alexey Sergeevich. Principles of criminal procedure//Jurisprudence.2003. No. 5. P.169-170.
Dikarev Ilya Stepanovich. The Optionality in criminal law of Russia: avtoref. dis.... kand. the faculty of law. sciences'. Volgograd, 2004. P.4.
Gadzhiyeva Aisha Ansarovna. The specified composition. P.97-98.
Polishchuk Elena Nikolaevna. Private law (dispositive) elements of criminal law//Legal science.2013. No. 2. P.60, 62-63.
Dyomin Aleksandr Vasilevich. Dispositve provisions of the tax law (the common approaches and sector-specific)/ //www. Sovremennoe Pravo.ru/....
Leyst Oleg Ernestovich. Norms of law //Theory of state and law: textbook //ed. Mikhail Nikolayevich Marchenko. M., 2009. P.731.
Briaynin Jakov Markovic. Criminal law and its application. M., 1967. P.63.
Kudryavtsev Vladimir Nikolaevich. Theoretical bases of qualification of crimes. M., 1963. P.128.
Hi same. The general theory of qualification of crimes. M., 1972 P.134.
Baru Mikhail Ivanovich. Evaluation of the concept in labour legislation//Soviet state and law.1970. No. 7. P.104.
Kashanina Tatiana Vasilyevna. Evaluation concepts in Soviet //Jurisprudence. 1976. No. 1. P.28.
Ignatenko Viktor Vasilyevich. Evaluation concepts in the legislation on administrative responsibility: author. dis.... kand. the faculty of law. sciences'. Sverdlovsk, 1989. P.9.
Kobzeva Elena Vasilyevna, Lopashenko Natalia Aleksandrovna. Evaluation features in the criminal law: the results of the expert survey / / Jurisprudence.2002. No. 2. P.90-101.
Goncharov Vladimir Borisovich, Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich. The problem of the discretion of the law enforcement entity in the field of law enforcement//State and law.2001. No. 3. P.51-60.
Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich. Dispositive norms of modern Russian law: concept, features, problems // Modern Law. 2016. №2.P.5-11; He is. Evaluation concepts and terms as a technical-legal means of law-making legal technology // Modern Law. 2018. №4.P.5-17.
Browse journals by subject